Pharaoh
posted on Mar 15, 2010 - 08:55 PM
This is more of a call for scholars with more knowledge than me to comment on the above subject line.
We have all heard various explanations of the reason behind the week of fasting which has been added to the beginning of the Great Lent.
What appears to be accurate is that this week of fasting began as a promise made to Emperor Heraclius in the 7th century. Heraclius had promised the Jews peace after becoming victorious over Jersusalem in 628. Prior, the Jews and Persians had conquered Jerusalem and destroyed it's churches and killed it's Christians.
Heraclius was then apparently persuaded to break his promise of peace for the Jews, and in return, a week of fasting would be conducted for him each year.
Apparently a number of sister churches discontinued this fast after Heraclius' death. The Coptic Church did not.
Now there are alternate explanations for this fast (making up for non-abstaining days, preparation, etc).
But the question is: Did this fast originate as described above and is it appropriate to continue it even if we have come up with alternate explanations?
I apologize in advance for any inadvertant inaccuracies in what I may have written. Again, I invite scholars to comment on this.
God Bless