Coptic Forums

The official forums of the Coptic Media Network, focusing on Coptic hymns, Orthodoxy, spirituality, friendship, and member experiences.

What was the time when Christ began to carry our sins?

Post new topic Reply to topic

Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

mikokiko

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on May 30, 2010 - 12:25 PM

Forget that the loving mother hands off the punishment to a third party, assume that she is in fact the one assigning the punishment (and indeed my mother has personally assigned me punishment out of justice, but also out of her love). In my example, she HANDED him to the authorities, indicating that she wanted it to happen. In other words, she wanted punishment for him, but she was also upset that he made the choice to be a serial killer (even after he died). The intention here is what matters, forget about who is externally acting it out. She still continues to wish (and to love him) that he had accepted her advice while he had the chance to. Her love does not end for him after he dies.

I don't think there is much difference if she is the one assigning punishment. You seem to be assuming that the person assigning capital punishment always has to in fact not give two cents (a form of hatred) about the person's life he is putting to an end.

I think the example works just fine to illustrate my point.

Secondly, time and time again I agreed with your definition that Love is defined as wishing the best for that person as much as is possible.

GB

View user's profile Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on May 30, 2010 - 06:49 PM

Well, I'm trying to guard that principle (that God punishes) for the sake of the principle itself, not because it matters for a different principle. Granted, I first used that principle to guard against any Divine Schizophrenia/Bi-polarity, but that's taken care of since you're saying "while he had the chance to" and "wishing the best for that person as much as is possible".

I personally find no efficacy in the example, and hence, would caution against using it. Now I can get into exactly which points you're using that example for and if I agree or disagree if it works, bas I have no interest in doing that whatsoever.

View user's profile Send private message

mikokiko

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on May 31, 2010 - 08:47 AM

No analogy is perfect except the thing it is itself analogizing. But I do think the analogy somewhat grasps the picture I am talking about, without trying to go into depths of the details in it.

God Bless Smile

View user's profile Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 05, 2010 - 10:09 PM

Pardon the non-ending nature of my posts on this thread, but as I read Patristics, I like to share things I come across that touch upon whatever topics I'm discussing/have discussed:

From St. Basil the Great:
They, then, that were sealed by the Spirit unto the day of redemption, and preserve pure and undiminished the first fruits which they received of the Spirit, are they that shall hear the words “well done thou good and faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things.” In like manner they which have grieved the Holy Spirit by the wickedness of their ways, or have not wrought for Him that gave to them, shall be deprived of what they have received, their grace being transferred to others; or, according to one of the evangelists, they shall even be wholly cut asunder,—the cutting asunder meaning complete separation from the Spirit. The body is not divided, part being delivered to chastisement, and part let off; for when a whole has sinned it were like the old fables, and unworthy of a righteous judge, for only the half to suffer chastisement. Nor is the soul cut in two,—that soul the whole of which possesses the sinful affection throughout, and works the wickedness in co-operation with the body. The cutting asunder, as I have observed, is the separation for aye of the soul from the Spirit.

For now, although the Spirit does not suffer admixture with the unworthy, He nevertheless does seem in a manner to be present with them that have once been sealed, awaiting the salvation which follows on their conversion; but then He will be wholly cut off from the soul that has defiled His grace. For this reason “In Hell there is none that maketh confession; in death none that remembereth God,” because the succour of the Spirit is no longer present. How then is it possible to conceive that the judgment is accomplished without the Holy Spirit, wherein the word points out that He is Himself the prize of the righteous, when instead of the earnest is given that which is perfect, and the first condemnation of sinners, when they are deprived of that which they seem to have?


- On the Holy Spirit

Anyway, that's how I will always think of hell - not agony by experiencing God, but agony by being completely abandoned by Him. In either case, His Divine Essence is administering the due punishment, so I didn't dwell much on this point. The bolded part is what I kept stressing by my before death/after death distinction.

Folks, the more I randomly read from the Fathers, the more I realize way too many people either misquote them or are extremely ignorant of them. So, I implore you, don't go to a random EO article online, find a bunch of quotes on fire, and start saying St. so and so must have taught such and such. Here's a quote from St. Basil about the sin/death dichotomy:

From St. Basil the Great:in baptism two ends were proposed; on the one hand, the destroying of the body of sin, that it may never bear fruit unto death; on the other hand, our living unto the Spirit, and having our fruit in holiness; the water receiving the body as in a tomb figures death, while the Spirit pours in the quickening power, renewing our souls from the deadness of sin unto their original life.

- On the Holy Spirit

Since Pope Shenouda III's book "Salvation in the Orthodox Concept" seems to be a favorite for people to disagree with (they whine about his focus on death), having read it several times, and now reading St. Basil's writings on the Holy Spirit, it's as if H.H. was direclty quoting St. Basil. For example:

From St. Basil the Great: ... so that the man who is being saved through imitation of Christ receives that old adoption. For perfection of life the imitation of Christ is necessary, not only in the example of gentleness, lowliness, and long suffering set us in His life, but also of His actual death.

and

From St. Basil the Great: For just as in the case of runners who turn and take the second course, a kind of halt and pause intervenes between the movements in the opposite direction, so also in making a change in lives it seemed necessary for death to come as mediator between the two, ending all that goes before, and beginning all that comes after. How then do we achieve the descent into hell? By imitating, through baptism, the burial of Christ. For the bodies of the baptized are, as it were, buried in the water. Baptism then symbolically signifies the putting off of the works of the flesh; as the apostle says, ye were “circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ; buried with him in baptism.” And there is, as it were, a cleansing of the soul from the filth that has grown on it from the carnal mind, as it is written, “Thou shalt wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.” On this account we do not, as is the fashion of the Jews, wash ourselves at each defilement, but own the baptism of salvation to be one. For there the death on behalf of the world is one, and one the resurrection of the dead, whereof baptism is a type. For this cause the Lord, who is the Dispenser of our life, gave us the covenant of baptism, containing a type of life and death, for the water fulfils the image of death, and the Spirit gives us the earnest of life.

View user's profile Send private message

mikokiko

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 06, 2010 - 10:18 AM

You're WRONG!
WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!

View user's profile Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 06, 2010 - 04:29 PM

The apparently not-so-great Basil and I have been pronounced quadruply wrong by, and on the authority of, St. Mikokiko the Great. Woe unto us.

View user's profile Send private message

mikokiko

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 07, 2010 - 06:13 PM

From Truth.Seeker:The apparently not-so-great Basil and I have been pronounced quadruply wrong by, and on the authority of, St. Mikokiko the Great. Woe unto us.
Woe unto you indeed. You should be ashamed of speaking blasphemy against my holiness. And just 'St. Mikokiko' will do.

I just want to annotate on what you said. While the sinner is in complete self-separation from God as St. Basil noted, God Himself has not been separated from the sinner, this is how He remains to torment them with the punishment of His Wrath.

God Bless

View user's profile Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 07, 2010 - 07:27 PM

If you want to disagree with St. Basil the Great, that is your business. Thus far, you have pronounced Sts. Cyril the Great (guilt of original sin) and Basil the Great wrong. Based on what? Your personal opinion. At least do St. Basil a favor and never try to quote him as standing for your opinion again.

Your statement:

From mikokiko:
I just want to annotate on what you said. While the sinner is in complete self-separation from God as St. Basil noted, God Himself has not been separated from the sinner, this is how He remains to torment them with the punishment of His Wrath.


is inaccurate, at best. That is not what St. Basil noted. I do not even have to say anything myself, I will just quote him again -

From St. Basil the Great:For now, although the Spirit does not suffer admixture with the unworthy, He nevertheless does seem in a manner to be present with them that have once been sealed, awaiting the salvation which follows on their conversion; but then He will be wholly cut off from the soul that has defiled His grace.

So, St. Basil saying that the Holy Spirit is wholly cut off from the soul of those in hell is him saying that "God Himself has not been separated from the sinner"?

Own up to your personal views and say that you think St. Basil is wrong on this.

View user's profile Send private message

mikokiko

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 07, 2010 - 10:14 PM

First off relax. I already told you that in Hell there is no forgiveness and therefore the Holy Spirit (God who dwells in us) is cut off from these people. The Holy Spirit is He who sanctifies, who rids us of our sin. This is precisely why these people have ended up where they are now, because all their lives they rejected the work of the Holy Spirit. So does that make null the words of St. Paul that the Presence of God remains to torment them? Of course not, their souls are just now wholly cut off from the Holy Spirit and its calling unto them.

I've owned up to my view long ago. I don't know what you are even trying to prove now. You already agreed with me that God's Holy Presence remains to torment them (with all its Properties) before, I don't see what the issue is and why you want to keep arguing with me.

I think you better own up to the view that you betrayed when you said that you have no problem saying that part of God's Nature, which causes the sinner in Hell suffering, is His Love. When before you said you had no problem in saying that not one iota of God's Love would reach Hell. I thought we already resolved the issue long ago. But when I thought I had the chance to lighten up the mood with a little silliness, you seemed to have gotten the urge to pull a diatribe on me.

GB

View user's profile Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 07, 2010 - 11:39 PM

Relax? I'm not the one shouting "wrong" four times in response to quotes from St. Basil.

From mikokiko:
You already agreed with me that God's Holy Presence remains to torment them (with all its Properties) before, I don't see what the issue is and why you want to keep arguing with me.


I never agreed with this. What I said was that if you want to say God's Divine Essence causes hell (as in, God punishes those in hell) and part of that is Love, I have no issue with that. I didn't agree that it's His Presence directly causing this suffering.

St. Paul does not say His Presence causes the suffering of hell. Here are the verses you are talking about:

2 Thessalonians 1: 9 These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, 10 when He comes, in that Day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe,because our testimony among you was believed.

1. "Truth.Seeker was shunned from the forum of coptichymns.net". Now, do you think that means the forum of coptichymns.net caused my shunning or do you see that that phraseology could just as easily mean the opposite of what you think? It'd be worthwhile to look into the Greek on this - but as far as the English translation is concerned, this could go either way.

2. Notwithstanding whatever the correct translation/interpretation of 1. above is, look at verse 10. "when He comes, in that Day." It puts verse 9 in the context of Judgment Day. In other words, His Presence and Glory on Judgment Day will judge the condemned to everlasting destruction. So, "from the presence" is not about hell itself at all, but about what precedes hell.

Well, which is it miko?

Is it

From mikokiko:I already told you that in Hell there is no forgiveness and therefore the Holy Spirit (God who dwells in us) is cut off from these people.

or

From mikokiko:God Himself has not been separated from the sinner.

?

And the Holy Spirit is only there to forgive sins? Whatever happened to "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control."?

Or is the Holy Spirit not God that if the Holy Spirit is wholly cut off from the sinners then God can still remain?

View user's profile Send private message

mikokiko

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 08, 2010 - 08:54 AM

From Truth.Seeker:Relax? I'm not the one shouting "wrong" four times in response to quotes from St. Basil.
I thought you would have understood by now that it was a joke, and that rather telling me to relax you should maybe actually be telling me to do the opposite.
From Truth.Seeker:St. Paul does not say His Presence causes the suffering of hell.
Though the verse posted says it all, this is the verse in context: "...since it is a righteous thing with God to repay with tribulation those who trouble you, and to give you who are troubled rest with us when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, when He comes, in that Day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe" (2 Thessalonians 1:6-10)
It is obvious here, that He is not talking about just judgment day but that the punishment will be everlasting. It is not limited to the point of Judgment.

Secondly, to say that you are simply punished by God to everlasting destruction is one thing, like how God punishes us here on earth through for example the chastisement of a mother. But to say that this everlasting destruction is FROM HIS presence AND from the GLORY OF HIS POWER is another thing. For in one, it is a command of the will, in the other it is coming directly from the things that are not at all identified as giving commands or causing things to happen. God's Glory does not tell me I have to repent, God does. We usually wouldn't say God's Presence forgives me my sins, but that God does. God's Glory has not punished me, when I found that all my lies have gotten me into much trouble, but God has. But to suffer everlasting destruction from the Presence of the Lord and from the Glory of His Power is quite another thing. It's far harder to interpret the verse the way you have. I think it is obvious that it is being said in the sense of "Tim died from starvation." Here death is directly caused by starvation. In the same way, God's Presence and Glory is revealed as Wrath in the sinner, and suffers everlasting destruction from it.

Furthermore, in some translations, the word Presence is translated as "face" (as I found in St. John Chrysostom's Homily). I hope this gives us some insight into the Greek word. It is speaking as of, and indicating something PRESENT punishing eternally with destruction. In St. John Chrysostom's Homily on verse 9 he says: "For since they were then much puffed up, there is no need, he says, of much trouble; it is enough that God comes and is seen, and all are involved in punishment and vengeance. His coming only to some indeed will be Light, but to others vengeance."

Notice the word here is not punished BY the presence of the Lord, but FROM it. Again, it doesn't seem here that this punishment is speaking about happening simply on the Day, but rather it is specifying WHEN the Lord Jesus will come to quicken this punishment. When will He arrive to give punishment and also glory? On Judgment Day. Notice also how it calls the Lord Jesus a flaming fire (as it says God is before), just as Hell is a suffering of fire. I do not at all doubt that Hell will be much like what the Lord told Ezekiel: "Therefore I have poured out My indignation on them; I have consumed them with the fire of My wrath; and I have recompensed their deeds on their own heads,” says the Lord GOD." (Ezekiel 22:31) For can it be denied that these people have grieved the Spirit and bereaved themselves of Him? Of course. But yet God's very Wrath burns them, as His Presence and Glory is revealed in them as such (Remembering that God doesn't transform to punish them but that they have become sinful). For just as the sun softens the wax candle but hardens clay, not arbitrarily but because of the different materials of the wax candle and the clay, so too will His Presence be received differently (this is but a different way of viewing the Afterlife).

Thirdly, St. Paul never even uses the word Hell in any of his epistles, nor does the word itself appear much in the Bible in general, so you are not going to see St. Paul stating it as explicitly as you have in my quote of what you said. The word Hell is a very debatable translation (in the King James) of what happens after Judgment Day.

Lastly, I've already provided several and not one instance (when you disagreed with the Love part) of Church Fathers saying His Presence (whether of Love or Justice or Holiness or what have you [or all His Properties]) causes their suffering. Remember St. Basil the Great himself said: "I believe that the fire prepared for the punishment of the devil and his angels is divided by the voice of the Lord. Thus, since there are two capacities in fire, one of burning and the other of illuminating, the fierce and scourging property of the fire may await those who deserve to burn, while illuminating and radiant warmth may be reserved for the enjoyment of those who are rejoicing." (Homily on Psalms, 28.6)

Unless you want to say that this fire that the righteous are being illuminated by in Joy is not God's Presence and Glory, we're good to go (keeping in mind that St. Paul himself calls God a consuming fire in Hebrews and the Lord Jesus a flaming fire here in Thessalonians.
From Truth.Seeker:Is it

From mikokiko:
I already told you that in Hell there is no forgiveness and therefore the Holy Spirit (God who dwells in us) is cut off from these people.


or

From mikokiko:
God Himself has not been separated from the sinner.


?

I already told you before it's both.

From Truth.Seeker:And the Holy Spirit is only there to forgive sins?You're making straw man arguments. I never said it was only there to forgive. But without it, you cannot be forgiven (that is why blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is the only unforgivable sin).
Remember, God dwells IN US by the Holy Spirit. And it is when it is in us (when we ACCEPT HIM) He cleanses us from sin and sanctifies us. Once this happens we are free from sin and can stand in front of God, as being justified before Him. Those who reject the offering of the Holy Spirit continually here on earth, will be forever deprived of it in Hell. This is why they remain in their sin with no forgiveness. This separation of the sinner from God, having no unity whatsoever with Him, will cause His Presence (as this cannot be limited) to burn them with everlasting destruction.

They are still separated, and indeed, in one sense this constitutes their suffering, for this separation is what constitutes the sin that gave them this Hell, but it only happens thus when the Fullness of His Presence is revealed. God never enters them, indeed they are separated from Him. But God's Presence is not separated from them, it causes them unspeakable destruction. For they, being unholy, are chastised by His Holiness. Had they been holy, then they would have already been in union (and not separation) from Him, and would not be hurt by His Presence. Had the sinners not been partly separated on earth from God, they would not experience suffering in their complete separation in Hell. I hope you understand what I am trying to say here.

PS. Usually, it's not either-or. It's never 'either it's this way or that'

GB

View user's profile Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 08, 2010 - 05:29 PM

Note: I re-edited this post because I don't think parts of my original reply were very on-point.

I already showed you how the word "from" could mean something other than "by". St. Chrysostom's homily could just as easily apply to what I said - God's Presence will judge them, not more need to be done. For the Ezekiel verse, you can only take the "pouring of wrath" to mean God's presence if you have used your conclusion as a premise. St. Basil's homily could just as easily be talking about His Divine Essence bringing about everything - again, you can only conclude it helps your point if you already use your point as a premise.

I should point out that in some translations, 2 Thessalonians 1:9 reads like what I am saying:

2 Thessalonians 1:9 (New International Version)
9They will be punished with everlasting destruction and shut out from the presence of the Lord and from the majesty of his power

2 Thessalonians 1:9 (New American Standard Bible)
9These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power,

2 Thessalonians 1:9 (English Standard Version)
9They will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might

2 Thessalonians 1:9 (New Revised Standard Version)
9 These will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, separated from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might

From mikokiko:
I already told you that in Hell there is no forgiveness and therefore the Holy Spirit (God who dwells in us) is cut off from these people.


That looks like the only thing the Holy Spirit is there for is forgiveness. It's an "if and only if ... then..." statement.
___

I see what you're saying. You mean that the Holy Spirit does not work in them but God's Presence (around them, but not in them) causes them this agony. And you say this to preserve the principle that God is omnipresent. My reply to you is that God is omnipresent right now, but obviously we do not fully experience Him. If something is possible now, it's possible then. In other words, the principle you are trying to preserve need not be preserved in the way you are trying to preserve it.

The Holy Spirit causes "love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control." The lack of those things is in itself the punishment. The extra step is unnecessary and does not have much of a foundation.

So, my question to you is: what principle is this theory based on?

You are still in disagreement with St. Basil - as he's attributing the cause of suffering in hell to the departure of the Holy Spirit, not the external presence of God.

View user's profile Send private message

mikokiko

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 09, 2010 - 06:12 PM

From Truth.Seeker:I already showed you how the word "from" could mean something other than "by". St. Chrysostom's homily could just as easily apply to what I said - God's Presence will judge them, not more need to be done. For the Ezekiel verse, you can only take the "pouring of wrath" to mean God's presence if you have used your conclusion as a premise. St. Basil's homily could just as easily be talking about His Divine Essence bringing about everything - again, you can only conclude it helps your point if you already use your point as a premise.
In the passage posted. St. Paul is telling the faithful in Thessaloniki that they will be relieved when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire. Yet the same Presence of the Lord will cause the persecutors everlasting destruction. Notice that the word "from" here, in the original Koine Greek text is "ἀπό", a From not as a result of but a "Because of". Secondly, in almost half of the English Translations the word Presence is translated as "Face". The added word "away" is found only in the very dubious New American Standard Bible translation. In other words they are "punished with everlasting destruction BECAUSE OF the Presence of the Lord and BECAUSE OF the Glory of His Power." If St. Paul had used the word "separated" or "cut off" in Greek we would have found it to be "Schizo", where we get our words scissors and scizophrenia (and divided-minded) from.

Moreover, if we keep on reading to the second Chapter we find St. Paul saying that "...the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming." (2 Thessalonians 2:8)

Notice here how the very Brightness of the Lord's Coming and being Present will cause the lawless to be destroyed. St. John Chrysostom writes in his Homily saying: It is enough for Him to be present, and all these things are destroyed. He will put a stop to the deceit, by only appearing.
Notice how he said about the previous verse that "...God comes and is seen, and all are involved in punishment and vengeance. His coming only to some indeed will be Light, but to others vengeance." He is saying here, His Coming, His Presence will BE LIGHT to some, and to others it WILL BE VENGEANCE (to those who have self-excluded themselves from His Grace).

You cannot possibly take your premise and apply it here, for it is saying that His very Coming will be Light to some and to others it will be Vengeance. You cannot possibly understand it in another way. I'm not using my premise to establish that, as St. Basil said:
"...there are two capacities in fire, one of burning and the other of illuminating, the fierce and scourging property of the fire may await those who deserve to burn, while illuminating and radiant warmth may be reserved for the enjoyment of those who are rejoicing." What is this SAME object acting on the unjust and the just alike? Acting differently on both? For what is the common denominator here? Is it not God? Something else perhaps?

The sun softens the wax candle but hardens clay, not arbitrarily but because of the different materials of the wax candle and the clay. Maybe this imagery will help clarify a few things. Picture a hut housing wax and clay. The wax and clay's only contact with the sun is through a distant window. The sun. not fully in view, only hardens and softens each in part. But one day that house will be destroyed and both will be exposed nakedly in front of that Sun. The Sun will then completely soften the wax candle, and completely harden the clay. The sinners who in part rejected the Spirit, will have wished to remain sheltered in the old battered house, but then it will be too late, for they refused to accept Him, and now fully will He leave them. This departure of the Spirit will cast them into utter and unimaginable sorrow.

C.S. Lewis writes of the experience in terms of Beauty and Horror: God is going to invade, all right: but what is the good of saying you are on His side then, when you see the whole natural universe melting away like a dream and something else--something it never entered your head to conceive -- comes crashing in; something so beautiful to some of us and so terrible to others that none of us will have any choice left? For this time it will be God without disguise; something so overwhelming that it will strike either irresistible love or irresistible horror into every creature. It will be too late then to choose your side. There is no use saying you choose to lie down when it has become impossible to stand up. That will not be the time for choosing: it will be the time when we discover which side we really have chosen, whether we realised it before or not. (Mere Christianity, Final Paragraph of Chapter 10)

In all honesty, without any preconceived notions of what Hell or Heaven is like, one could not possibly take any different understanding from the words "these will be punished with everlasting destruction from the Presence of the Lord and from the Glory of His Power." Again, one does not receive forgiveness from the Presence of the Lord and from the Glory of His Power. When one is convicted for fraud, he is not being chastised from the Presence of the Lord and from the Glory of His Power. However, God certainly is punishing him. When one prays in humility and persistence for God's help the prayers are not answered from the Presence of the Lord and the Glory of His Power, but simply by God. Like I said in one case (where it is just God) it is a command of the will. In the other (the Presence of the Lord and the Glory of His Power and also the Brightness of His Coming) it is coming directly from the things that are not at all identified as giving commands or causing things to happen.

Anyway, this discussion has been going on forever, indeed, its allowing me to better grasp the meaning of the word 'everlasting'. I won't be surprised if it's only end will be Judgement Day itself Wink. Maybe that's how God will resolve our argument. "You want an answer? Let me show you." Smile

GB

View user's profile Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 09, 2010 - 07:18 PM

From mikokiko:
Anyway, this discussion has been going on forever, indeed, its allowing me to better grasp the meaning of the word 'everlasting'. I won't be surprised if it's only end will be Judgement Day itself . Maybe that's how God will resolve our argument. "You want an answer? Let me show you."


Haha, good one man. I was actually thinking this yesterday.

Like I said, and this is not me skirting the issue (and I read everything you just wrote), I actually think that the verses are talking about Judgment Day (which, by the way, only makes sense if your usage of the word "from" is accurate here). I was just throwing the kitchen sink at you (I'm sure you would not have it any other way Wink). So, with that said, let's look at it:

Here is how I see it playing out: everything comes to a halt, Christ is revealed from Heaven. All those who've obeyed Him think "finally!", all those who disobeyed Him think "all was vanity and grasping for the wind, there was no profit under the Sun, and no profit for me now". His coming will be that of the Judge (look at our Creed). What's going to happen to those going to Heaven? Eternal bliss. What's going to happen to those going to Hell? Everlasting destruction. What prompts one or the other? God's Judgment revealed by His coming.


"...there are two capacities in fire, one of burning and the other of illuminating, the fierce and scourging property of the fire may await those who deserve to burn, while illuminating and radiant warmth may be reserved for the enjoyment of those who are rejoicing."


And if St. Basil was talking about God's Justice? Then what? Notice how I quote the Fathers - paragraphs or pages at a time. Why? To see their whole thought. We simply cannot pinpoint what it is St. Basil is talking about here. He's talking about God - but is he talking about the Presence of God, the Justice of God, what is he talking about? All I see is St. Basil saying God is going to reward some and punish some. What we are talking about is how the punishment is handed out. I've actually tried to find this homily before but could not, if you can find it, that'll give us something more concrete to consider.

If you want me to pick it apart: St. Basil himself is breaking down which properties of the fire will act. That's not what you're trying to do. You're trying to say it's the same exact Presence causing these reactions. He's saying it's different Properties of that Presence causing these reactions. That sounds much more like my first posts on this topic than what you're trying to maintain right now. Again, just throwing the kitchen sink at you.

C.S. Lewis is talking about Judgment Day, nothing more.

I still want to know why you think it's important to maintain what you maintain. From my standpoint, it seems like a foreign idea, and that's why I am resistant. Why are you for it?

P.S. bad move on the other thread, having "DO NOT CENSURE" in the title was asking for it, haha.

View user's profile Send private message

mikokiko

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 09, 2010 - 08:10 PM

From Truth.Seeker:Here is how I see it playing it: everything comes to a halt, Christ is revealed from Heaven. All those who've obeyed Him think "finally!", all those who disobeyed Him think "all was vanity and grasping for the wind, there was no profit under the Sun, and no profit for me now". His coming will be that of the Judge (look at our Creed). What's going to happen to those going to Heaven? Eternal bliss. What's going to happen to those going to Hell? Everlasting destruction. What prompts one or the other? God's Judgment revealed by His coming.
No disagreement here.
From Truth.Seeker:And if St. Basil was talking about God's Justice? Then what? Notice how I quote the Fathers - paragraphs or pages at a time. Why? To see their whole thought. We simply cannot pinpoint what it is St. Basil is talking about here. He's talking about God - but is he talking about the Presence of God, the Justice of God, what is he talking about? All I see is St. Basil saying God is going to reward some and punish some. What we are talking about is how the punishment is handed out.
He was exegeting a Psalm. I believe it was Psalm 29:7: "The voice of the LORD divides the flames of fire." But do you see how the unjust are suffering from the same fire that fills the faithful with joy and illumination? What thing could the two possibly have in common except God? God, the consuming fire, is the one directly striking terror and suffering into the hearts of the sinful and Joy and Illumination into the righteous. What other thing is common to both, directly acting on the believers in Heaven and the unrighteous in Hell?

From Truth.Seeker:If you want me to pick it apart: St. Basil himself is breaking down which properties of the fire will act. That's not what you're trying to do. You're trying to say it's the same exact Presence causing these reactions. He's saying it's different Properties of that Presence causing these reactions. That sounds much more like my first posts on this topic than what you're trying to maintain right now. Again, just throwing the kitchen sink at you.
And even if we want to explain it that way (though we have shown it to be illogical), it is still God and His Properties directly causing Suffering to those who hate Him and Comfort to those who love Him.
From Truth.Seeker:C.S. Lewis is talking about Judgment Day, nothing more.
True, I don't know about the nothing more part.
From Truth.Seeker:I still want to know why you think it's important to maintain what you maintain.
I don't really think it is important at all. I just think that it gives us a more logically cohesive view, and a view that makes sense of the "Depart from Me" (for had they not had sin, that is separation, they would not suffer from His Presence), and the Suffering eternal wrath at the hands of God.

Look at what St. John Chrysostom said: "His coming only to some indeed will be Light, but to others vengeance." His very coming and Presence (for he is here speaking of the Glory and the Everlasting Destruction respectively) will BE Light to some and Vengeance for others. That's pretty crystal clear.

In 2 Thessalonians 2:8 it reads: "the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming." Here the Lord is directly acting on the lawless. He destroys with the Brightness of His Coming (and He doesn't leave).

Again in 2 Thessalonians 1:9 it says that "these are punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power." Again 'from' here in the Greek is the word "Apo" also translated as Because of. I think it's very apparent (without preconceived notions of Heaven and Hell) that the Presence of the Lord and the Glory of His Power are the direct cause of the sinners' everlasting Punishment.

From Truth.Seeker:From my standpoint, it seems like a foreign idea, and that's why I am resistant.
It's never a good reason to deny something because it's foreign. Otherwise we would have to be content knowing nothing at all.

From Truth.Seeker:P.S. bad move on the other thread, having "DO NOT CENSURE" in the title was asking for it, haha.
Haha, yeah that was rich. There have been quite a few threads that I started that got deleted. Confused

GB

View user's profile Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 10, 2010 - 12:46 AM

I don't think we'll agree (at least not now). Unless I read something later on or a thought comes to me telling me otherwise, doesn't look like your view is much of a problem (as far as my view goes). So, I can leave it there.

View user's profile Send private message

mikokiko

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Jun 10, 2010 - 02:30 PM

Sounds good then. We'll agree to disagree. Smile

GB

View user's profile Send private message
 
 
 

Return to the Forum Index

Powered by the coptichymns.net Network of Coptic Hymns and Coptic Orthodox Sites.

TotalDaily
Topics:77672.49
Users:61951.99
Posts:6463120.74
 

518 unlogged users and No registered users online now.

 

Already a member? Log in above.

Not a member? Register your unique identity to participate more fully in our site!